EBQ:Canadian C-spine Rule Study: Difference between revisions
(New Content) |
(New content) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Study Design== | ==Study Design== | ||
Prospective cohort study of blunt trauma patients (to head and neck) from 10 Canadian EDs (community and university hospitals), where each pt was evaluated for 20 standardized clinical findings before radiographs. Subset of patients were assessed by second EM physician independently. Additional 5 demographic variables obtained by study RNs from hospital records. | |||
==Inclusion Criteria== | ==Inclusion Criteria== | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 13 January 2014
incomplete Journal Club Article
Stiell, Ian et al. "The Canadian C-spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients". JAMA. 2001. 286(15):1841-1848.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Can a clinical decision rule be used to evaluate the cervical spine in alert and stable trauma patients?
Conclusion
THe Canadian C-spine rule is a highly sensitive decision rule for evaluate of clinically significant cervical spine injuries in trauma patients
Major Points
Three Main Questions:
- Is there any high-risk factor that mandates radiography?
- Is there any low-risk factor that allows safe assessment of ROM?
- Is pt able to actively rotate neck 45° to the left and right?
Study Design
Prospective cohort study of blunt trauma patients (to head and neck) from 10 Canadian EDs (community and university hospitals), where each pt was evaluated for 20 standardized clinical findings before radiographs. Subset of patients were assessed by second EM physician independently. Additional 5 demographic variables obtained by study RNs from hospital records.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Interventions
Outcome
Primary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes
Subgroup analysis
Criticisms & Further Discussion
Funding
CME
